Issue 11: Boredom, Embarrassment, & Pluto š°
Outline
We wanted to kick this weekās issue off with a word of appreciation for reader Mirjam N., who pointed out that one of the articles we shared last week didnāt exactly fall into the ālearning scienceā category. Thanks for the feedback and please send us your thoughts and comments -- weāre listening! Now, on to this weekās science-y stuff.
āSomething to Talk About
Researchers at the University of Hong Kong (go Lions!) recently conducted a study to determine which discussion post characteristics were more likely to generate conversation among learners. In a review of discussion postings in a non-formal learning environment, they discovered that messages that expressed disagreement or asked a question were more likely to generate responses from learners.
Key Takeaway: If youāre trying to generate a collaborative learning environment, encourage your learners to post questions in the forum. In this study, when a message explicitly invited further response in a question format, its likelihood of getting a response would significantly increase from 53% to 77%.
Read More (paywalled article): Chen, G., Lo, C.K., & Hu, L. (2020). Sustaining online academic discussions: Identifying the characteristics of messages that receive responses. Computers & Education, 156.
ā
When Thereās Something Strange...
...in the neighborhood, who you gonna call? No, weāre not ghost-busting, but rather myth-busting, and in this case, weāre calling on Tracey Tokuhama-Espinosa, author of the 2018 insta-classic Neuromyths: Debunking False Ideas About the Brain.
You might have heard this one before: the brain has unlimited memory capacity -- as much as 1 petabyte, or the entire Internet. Right? Well, probably not. While your boss might have a perfect memory of everything youāve done wrong, the brain does not remember everything itās ever experienced, according to Tokuhama-Espinosa. Instead, āpeople can remember things easily when they can be related to something already known; when they are of personal interest; and/or when they have survival valueā (p. 142). Iād also argue that Iām able to remember things when theyāre super-embarrassing (like that time I fell in the cafeteria in kindergarten, spilling my tray of food everywhere. Good times).
Key Takeaway: Relating concepts to existing knowledge is one way to help learners remember new content.
Read More (book, borrow from your local public library!): Neuromyths: Debunking False Ideas About the Brain.
Tedious & Boring
No, weāre not talking about your last staff meeting. (Well, maybe we are.) Weāre talking about learning -- in a recent article, researchers sought to discover the qualities that boost learnersā resilience to boredom. In both studies reported in this article, learners with higher mindfulness reported higher boredom tolerance that, in turn, predicted greater academic diligence.
Key Takeaway: Early findings show that mindfulness-based interventions might improve learning performance, so incorporating mindfulness exercises into your regular practice might help you (and your learners) endure tedious tasks and activities.
Read More (paywalled article): Galla, B.M., Esposito, M.V., & Fiore, H.M. (2020). Mindfulness predicts academic diligence in the face of boredom. Learning & Individual Differences, 81.
Quote of the Week
āWorking diligently on academic tasks despite boredom is critical for advancing long-term learning goals.ā Galla, Esposito, & Fiore, 2020
Agree, or disagree? Chime in Twitter; use the hashtag #lswqotw and donāt forget to @ us! @LearnSciWeekly
We're taking a brief hiatus next week, but we'll be back in August with more fresh learning science news!
āPets of Learning Science Weekly
This week weāre featuring Pluto, bunny companion of reader Lynda K. Apparently, Pluto loves breakfast in bed, followed by a nice long nap (who doesnāt?!). Thanks for sharing a pic of the worldās luckiest bunny, Lynda!

Send us your pet pics at editor@learningscienceweekly.com.
Wondering why weāre including animal photos in a learning science newsletter? It may seem weird, we admit. But weāre banking on the baby schema effect and the āpower of Kawaii.ā So, send us your cute pet pics -- youāre helping us all learn better!ā
The LSW Crew
Learning Science Weekly is edited by Julia Huprich, Ph.D. Our head of growth and community is Julieta Cygiel.
Have something to share? Want to see something in next week's issue? Send your suggestions: editor@learningscienceweekly.com